[RESPONSE] Everybody is biased, so I’m sure I’ve done some of it. But I try hard very not to. A way to do that is by spelling out things that would change my conclusions:

• IFR below 0.1%
• Knowledge that there aren’t heavy long-term consequences for survivors
• Proof that it’s better for the economy to not have a lockdown in the long-term
• A vaccine that would take several years to come

In the meantime, decisions should be judged based on currently available data. If I’m wrong anywhere, I’d love to know!